Simon’s Law

Haven’t Heard of It

In the wake of the Charlie Gard case, the Federalist posted an article on the need for states to implement “Simon’s Law,” to prevent such a case from occurring in the US. At issue is parental authority—who makes the decision for life or death in such tragic circumstances. The article talks about an infant, Simon Crosier, and his family. Simon, like Charlie, was born with a serious congenital illness that required life-sustaining medical treatment. His condition was quickly labeled “incompatible with life” by the medical personnel treating him and, unknown to his parents, a DNR order was placed in his medical chart. The parents were hoping that as he grew, Simon would be eligible for corrective heart surgery. This did not happen. Instead, after Simon’s death, his parents learned that only “comfort feeds” had been authorized, thus ensuring his death. Simon’s Law, passed by the state of Kansas, sought primarily to combat the trend of medical providers secretly placing DNR orders on the medical charts of seriously ill infants. In Simon’s case, the medical personnel made the decision that Simon’s life was not worth living, and that any further medical treatment was futile. Many times in our culture, people make the judgment that the child of an unplanned pregnancy will suffer from abuse or other hardship. This belief is often used as a reason for tolerating abortion. But just as in the cases of Charlie and Simon, all life should be given a chance. Our culture will be judged in future generations by how we treated those among us who were the most vulnerable. Certainly, we who follow Christ have a duty to protect “the least of these.” God bless you for your witness.